<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EMI sues Grooveshark, but what about the songwriters?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.runwiththelaw.com/2009/06/emi-v-grooveshark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.runwiththelaw.com/2009/06/emi-v-grooveshark/</link>
	<description>AN ENDURANCE RUNNER'S PERSPECTIVE ON LEGAL NEWS AND EVENTS</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 13:27:50 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: kent</title>
		<link>http://www.runwiththelaw.com/2009/06/emi-v-grooveshark/comment-page-1/#comment-243</link>
		<dc:creator>kent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 04:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.runwiththelaw.com/?p=300#comment-243</guid>
		<description>What i don&#039;t understood is actually how you&#039;re not actually much more well-liked than you may be right now. You&#039;re very intelligent. You realize thus considerably relating to this subject, produced me personally consider it from a lot of varied angles. Its like women and men aren&#039;t fascinated unless it’s one thing to accomplish with Lady gaga! Your own stuffs excellent. Always maintain it up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What i don&#39;t understood is actually how you&#39;re not actually much more well-liked than you may be right now. You&#39;re very intelligent. You realize thus considerably relating to this subject, produced me personally consider it from a lot of varied angles. Its like women and men aren&#39;t fascinated unless it’s one thing to accomplish with Lady gaga! Your own stuffs excellent. Always maintain it up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to Get Pregnant </title>
		<link>http://www.runwiththelaw.com/2009/06/emi-v-grooveshark/comment-page-1/#comment-229</link>
		<dc:creator>How to Get Pregnant </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 15:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.runwiththelaw.com/?p=300#comment-229</guid>
		<description>In keeping with its partnership, Grooveshark will assist the Pledge 5 Foundation in their upcoming poker charity drive to benefit St. Francis House. ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In keeping with its partnership, Grooveshark will assist the Pledge 5 Foundation in their upcoming poker charity drive to benefit St. Francis House. &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brisbane seo</title>
		<link>http://www.runwiththelaw.com/2009/06/emi-v-grooveshark/comment-page-1/#comment-228</link>
		<dc:creator>brisbane seo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 10:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.runwiththelaw.com/?p=300#comment-228</guid>
		<description>The company sues Microsoft over its GUI. 1989: The Mac Portable is released. The company is sued by both the Beatles&#039; Apple Corps and by Xerox. ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The company sues Microsoft over its GUI. 1989: The Mac Portable is released. The company is sued by both the Beatles&#39; Apple Corps and by Xerox. &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EMI Grooveshark Update &#171; Run with the Law</title>
		<link>http://www.runwiththelaw.com/2009/06/emi-v-grooveshark/comment-page-1/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>EMI Grooveshark Update &#171; Run with the Law</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.runwiththelaw.com/?p=300#comment-62</guid>
		<description>[...] of you may remember the EMI v. Grooveshark from my earlier post EMI sues Grooveshark, but what about the songwriters? Big news today is that Grooveshark and EMI have come to a licensing agreement thereby ending the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of you may remember the EMI v. Grooveshark from my earlier post EMI sues Grooveshark, but what about the songwriters? Big news today is that Grooveshark and EMI have come to a licensing agreement thereby ending the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Should Songwriters want to get paid for 30 second previews? &#171; Run with the Law</title>
		<link>http://www.runwiththelaw.com/2009/06/emi-v-grooveshark/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Should Songwriters want to get paid for 30 second previews? &#171; Run with the Law</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.runwiththelaw.com/?p=300#comment-61</guid>
		<description>[...] course my whole theory could be rendered moot if people just find other (less legal) ways to preview songs (and continue to buy the same amount of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] course my whole theory could be rendered moot if people just find other (less legal) ways to preview songs (and continue to buy the same amount of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

