http://www.runwiththelaw.com/2009/06/amazon-california-and-law-firm-jobs/ AN ENDURANCE RUNNER'S PERSPECTIVE ON LEGAL NEWS AND EVENTS Wed, 21 Jul 2010 02:38:46 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 http://www.runwiththelaw.com/2009/06/amazon-california-and-law-firm-jobs/comment-page-1/#comment-76 Amy Wed, 24 Jun 2009 20:14:43 +0000 http://www.runwiththelaw.com/?p=333#comment-76 I'm hoping so too on both fronts! I'm hoping so too on both fronts!

]]> http://www.runwiththelaw.com/2009/06/amazon-california-and-law-firm-jobs/comment-page-1/#comment-77 Amy Wed, 24 Jun 2009 20:14:43 +0000 http://www.runwiththelaw.com/?p=333#comment-77 I'm hoping so too on both fronts! I'm hoping so too on both fronts!

]]> http://www.runwiththelaw.com/2009/06/amazon-california-and-law-firm-jobs/comment-page-1/#comment-78 Amy Wed, 24 Jun 2009 20:14:43 +0000 http://www.runwiththelaw.com/?p=333#comment-78 I'm hoping so too on both fronts! I'm hoping so too on both fronts!

]]> http://www.runwiththelaw.com/2009/06/amazon-california-and-law-firm-jobs/comment-page-1/#comment-79 Amy Wed, 24 Jun 2009 20:14:43 +0000 http://www.runwiththelaw.com/?p=333#comment-79 I'm hoping so too on both fronts! I'm hoping so too on both fronts!

]]> http://www.runwiththelaw.com/2009/06/amazon-california-and-law-firm-jobs/comment-page-1/#comment-80 GregSJ Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:13:11 +0000 http://www.runwiththelaw.com/?p=333#comment-80 Apparently individual California residents are supposed to keep track of all of their purchases from out of state online advertisers that don't collect sales tax and pay it with their yearly income tax. Thus the projected income from this change would just collect that revenue from retailers rather than individuals. I for one did not know that I was supposed to be paying sales tax on online purchases from out of state retailers. It appears that nobody must know which is why instead of going after individuals the state is choosing to go after retailers. For more info check out the podcast at <a href="http://geekcast.fm/archives/thespew-episode-2-ca-ab178-for-dummie/" rel="nofollow">http://geekcast.fm/archives/thespew-episode-2-c...</a> Apparently individual California residents are supposed to keep track of all of their purchases from out of state online advertisers that don't collect sales tax and pay it with their yearly income tax. Thus the projected income from this change would just collect that revenue from retailers rather than individuals. I for one did not know that I was supposed to be paying sales tax on online purchases from out of state retailers. It appears that nobody must know which is why instead of going after individuals the state is choosing to go after retailers. For more info check out the podcast at http://geekcast.fm/archives/thespew-episode-2-c...

]]> http://www.runwiththelaw.com/2009/06/amazon-california-and-law-firm-jobs/comment-page-1/#comment-81 GregSJ Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:13:11 +0000 http://www.runwiththelaw.com/?p=333#comment-81 Apparently individual California residents are supposed to keep track of all of their purchases from out of state online advertisers that don't collect sales tax and pay it with their yearly income tax. Thus the projected income from this change would just collect that revenue from retailers rather than individuals. I for one did not know that I was supposed to be paying sales tax on online purchases from out of state retailers. It appears that nobody must know which is why instead of going after individuals the state is choosing to go after retailers. For more info check out the podcast at <a href="http://geekcast.fm/archives/thespew-episode-2-ca-ab178-for-dummie/" rel="nofollow">http://geekcast.fm/archives/thespew-episode-2-c...</a> Apparently individual California residents are supposed to keep track of all of their purchases from out of state online advertisers that don't collect sales tax and pay it with their yearly income tax. Thus the projected income from this change would just collect that revenue from retailers rather than individuals. I for one did not know that I was supposed to be paying sales tax on online purchases from out of state retailers. It appears that nobody must know which is why instead of going after individuals the state is choosing to go after retailers. For more info check out the podcast at http://geekcast.fm/archives/thespew-episode-2-c...

]]> http://www.runwiththelaw.com/2009/06/amazon-california-and-law-firm-jobs/comment-page-1/#comment-82 GregSJ Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:13:11 +0000 http://www.runwiththelaw.com/?p=333#comment-82 Apparently individual California residents are supposed to keep track of all of their purchases from out of state online advertisers that don't collect sales tax and pay it with their yearly income tax. Thus the projected income from this change would just collect that revenue from retailers rather than individuals. I for one did not know that I was supposed to be paying sales tax on online purchases from out of state retailers. It appears that nobody must know which is why instead of going after individuals the state is choosing to go after retailers. For more info check out the podcast at <a href="http://geekcast.fm/archives/thespew-episode-2-ca-ab178-for-dummie/" rel="nofollow">http://geekcast.fm/archives/thespew-episode-2-c...</a> Apparently individual California residents are supposed to keep track of all of their purchases from out of state online advertisers that don't collect sales tax and pay it with their yearly income tax. Thus the projected income from this change would just collect that revenue from retailers rather than individuals. I for one did not know that I was supposed to be paying sales tax on online purchases from out of state retailers. It appears that nobody must know which is why instead of going after individuals the state is choosing to go after retailers. For more info check out the podcast at http://geekcast.fm/archives/thespew-episode-2-c...

]]> http://www.runwiththelaw.com/2009/06/amazon-california-and-law-firm-jobs/comment-page-1/#comment-83 GregSJ Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:13:11 +0000 http://www.runwiththelaw.com/?p=333#comment-83 Apparently individual California residents are supposed to keep track of all of their purchases from out of state online advertisers that don't collect sales tax and pay it with their yearly income tax. Thus the projected income from this change would just collect that revenue from retailers rather than individuals. I for one did not know that I was supposed to be paying sales tax on online purchases from out of state retailers. It appears that nobody must know which is why instead of going after individuals the state is choosing to go after retailers. For more info check out the podcast at <a href="http://geekcast.fm/archives/thespew-episode-2-ca-ab178-for-dummie/" rel="nofollow">http://geekcast.fm/archives/thespew-episode-2-c...</a> Apparently individual California residents are supposed to keep track of all of their purchases from out of state online advertisers that don't collect sales tax and pay it with their yearly income tax. Thus the projected income from this change would just collect that revenue from retailers rather than individuals. I for one did not know that I was supposed to be paying sales tax on online purchases from out of state retailers. It appears that nobody must know which is why instead of going after individuals the state is choosing to go after retailers. For more info check out the podcast at http://geekcast.fm/archives/thespew-episode-2-c...

]]> http://www.runwiththelaw.com/2009/06/amazon-california-and-law-firm-jobs/comment-page-1/#comment-14 Amy Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:14:43 +0000 http://www.runwiththelaw.com/?p=333#comment-14 I'm hoping so too on both fronts! I'm hoping so too on both fronts!

]]> http://www.runwiththelaw.com/2009/06/amazon-california-and-law-firm-jobs/comment-page-1/#comment-13 GregSJ Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:13:11 +0000 http://www.runwiththelaw.com/?p=333#comment-13 Apparently individual California residents are supposed to keep track of all of their purchases from out of state online advertisers that don't collect sales tax and pay it with their yearly income tax. Thus the projected income from this change would just collect that revenue from retailers rather than individuals. I for one did not know that I was supposed to be paying sales tax on online purchases from out of state retailers. It appears that nobody must know which is why instead of going after individuals the state is choosing to go after retailers. For more info check out the podcast at <a href="http://geekcast.fm/archives/thespew-episode-2-ca-ab178-for-dummie/" rel="nofollow">http://geekcast.fm/archives/thespew-episode-2-c...</a> Apparently individual California residents are supposed to keep track of all of their purchases from out of state online advertisers that don't collect sales tax and pay it with their yearly income tax. Thus the projected income from this change would just collect that revenue from retailers rather than individuals. I for one did not know that I was supposed to be paying sales tax on online purchases from out of state retailers. It appears that nobody must know which is why instead of going after individuals the state is choosing to go after retailers. For more info check out the podcast at http://geekcast.fm/archives/thespew-episode-2-c...

]]>